May 18th, 2009 by Stacy.Epstein
I recently finished reading a great memoir, Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, which inspired this blog post. Ayaan Hirsi Ali was born in Mogadishu, Somalia and after moving from Somalia to Saudi Arabia to Ethiopia to Kenya she finally landed in Holland. Ayaan was able to gain refugee status and eventually earned her Dutch citizenship after running away from an arranged marriage. In Holland she studied politics and ended up being elected as a member of the Dutch Parliament. She actually became a household name throughout Europe. Of course here in the United States the news didn’t travel that far, at least I had no idea who she was and I felt like I should have known her name. She was a strong force in Dutch Parliament fighting for women’s rights, in particular Muslim women’s rights. One of her platforms struck a chord with me and really made me think.
Holland is a very liberal and open country. When they started granting refugee status to a large number of Muslims the Dutch let them form their own communities instead of forcing assimilation. However, as someone who grew up in these communities, Ayaan noticed that a lot of the violations of human rights, in particular women’s rights, that were happening in Africa and the Middle East were continuing to happen in these small communities in Holland. Young girls were still being circumcised behind closed doors, honor killings were still taking place, and domestic violence was a growing problem. Ayaan pushed parliament to research just how engrained these violent religious roots ran and unveiled that an alarming number of social injustices were being allowed to take place due to the formation of separate communities and schools. She lobbied for integration and assimilation and for this to fully happen Muslim schools had to be disbanded.
Often as Westerners who are “liberal” and champion human rights I think we feel that assimilation is a negative thing because it forces people to give up their own culture in the process. But when that culture has a particularly violent history, is it wrong to request a group of people to give it up in the name of assimilation? Another thing we tend to shy away from is labeling cultures or religions as violent for fear of wrongly stereotyping or appearing prejudice. But when the holy texts are particularly violent and the religion tends to follow the text literally, is it wrong to label the religion as itself as the producer of human rights violations? Ayaan had to go into hiding because of the death threats she received for speaking out against Islam and Muslim communities in Holland. A dear friend and director who worked on a documentary with her, Theo van Gogh, was even brutally assassinated for their work together. Ironically enough many of the death threats she received were from Muslims who were offended because she denounced Islam for its violent tendencies.
There is no doubt that Islamic culture has produced communities with violent tendencies. And if a culture is violent and clashes with Universal Human Rights ideals that we in the West often strive for, is it violating those basic human rights to ask them to give that culture up? I’m personally am not ready to answer that question myself, but I can thank Ayaan for pushing me to truly examine all sides of an issue.
Sphere: Related Content









